SBRI19013U Pharma III – Pharmaceutical and Biotech Regulation
BRIDGE - Translational Excellence Programme
Lectures, Site visits and discussions with key industry players from both speciality pharma companies (Novo Nordisk, Lundbeck, LEO) and biotech companies (Genmab, Symphogen, Orphazyme).
On completion of the course, the participants should be able to:
- Understand how the organizational set-up supports how projects are prioritized in pharmaceutical and biotech companies
- Understand the rationale behind key business processes in the pharmaceutical and biotech industry
- Describe how a pharmaceutical company is organized to secure optimal decision processes between research and development (R&D) and commercial units
- Describe the processes behind construction of a portfolio review board
- Describe the interdependency between scientific, financial and commercial criteria for building a profitable drug portfolio
- Explain the rationale behind a project management portfolio, including how companies decide from a pool of competing projects to create a profitable portfolio that achieve the company’s strategic goals
- Discuss and understand commercial decision structures in pharmaceutical companies
- Discuss and understand potential political factors influencing decisions in pharmaceutical companies
To be decided and confirmed together with management in companies.
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2014:8 2009–2016, Review. Antti Jekunen, Decision-making in product portfolios of pharmaceutical research and development – managing streams of innovation in highly regulated markets.
M. Ding et al. (eds.), Innovation and Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 83-118.
International Series in Quantitative Marketing 20, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7801-0_3,
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014. Chapter 3, Min Ding, Songting Dong, Jehoshua Eliashberg, and Arun Gopalakrishnan: Portfolio Management in New Drug Development.
Z. Antonijevic (ed.), 2015. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Optimization of Pharmaceutical R&D Programs and Portfolios: Design and Investment Strategy, Chapter 2 p19-33: Clinical Aspects of Pharmaceutical Portfolio Management Frederic (Rick) Sax , Raymond A. Huml , and Judith Ng-Cashin
Schuhmacher et al. J Transl Med (2016) 14:105. Changing R&D models in research-based pharmaceutical companies.
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 3 (2017) 651-657. Richard C. Mohs, Nigel H. Greig: Perspective: Drug discovery and development: Role of basic biological research
Schuhmacher et al. J Transl Med (2018) 16:119, Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making?
Automatic registration upon appointment in the Translational Excellence Programme
- 0 ECTS
- Type of assessment
- Continuous assessmentCourse participationAttendance and active participation
- Exam registration requirements
Participants are automatically registered for the Examination upon course registration.
- All aids allowed
- Marking scale
- passed/not passed
- Censorship form
- No external censorship
Criteria for exam assesment
Attendance and active participation