NIFK25003U Analysing Public Policy: Institutions, Time and Processes

Volume 2025/2026
Education

MSc programme in European Environmental Economics and Policy

 

 

Content

The way in which governments respond to policy problems is puzzling, not only for scholars but often also for practitioners. Rational problem solving often proves difficult as policy makers attempt to overcome various institutional and political challenges during the policy cycle.

Governments, whether in Denmark or elsewhere, often find themselves embroiled in complex processes when addressing problems emerging on the policy agenda. Therefore, observing public policy making from a comparative perspective, numerous questions lend themselves to scrutiny. For instance, why do governments declare some social or economic conditions policy problems while ignoring others? Why can a public policy be considered a success and failure at the same time? Why are politicians overreacting in relation to some policy problems while underreacting when addressing others? Why do different governments confronting similar problems address them very differently? Why are some policies difficult to reform despite obvious needs for change? Why do policies which have been stable for long periods suddenly become exposed to demands for radical change? Why are some policy reforms reversed in the post-enactment phase while others are enduring?

The course is an advanced general introduction to the public policy process. It will introduce general concepts and analytical frameworks that can be applied in studies of environmental policy making. The policy phenomena being addressed will include path dependency and sequencing, punctuated equilibrium, policy instruments and mixes, policy feedback, policy capacity, disproportionality in public policy, reform sustainability and policy success and failure.

Learning Outcome

Knowledge

Upon completion of the course, the participants must be able to:

  • demonstrate ability to define key concepts and explain selected analytical frameworks applied in the study of public policy.
  • compare key concepts and theoretical frameworks and identify to which environmental policy problematiques they can be applied.
  • discuss application of theoretical concepts and analytical frameworks to specific policy cases
  • critically reflect on the strengths and limitations of the key concepts and theoretical frameworks and their ability to explain public policy phenomena.

 

Skills:

Upon completion of the course, the participants must be able to:

  • select relevant theoretical concepts to analyse public policy issues.
  • explain policy challenge by the use of selected concepts introduced in the course
  • discuss the applicability of alternative theoretical frameworks to analyse various  policy issues in the five stages of the policy cycle
  • Reflect critically on the ability of selected theoretical concepts to explain public policy issues.

 

Competences:

Upon completion of the course, the participants must be able to:

  • apply analytical approaches to develop theoretical and practice-oriented arguments related to various stages of the policy cycle.
  • systematically process evidence and use it to support such arguments.
  • reflect critically on the evidence and analysis applied to support theoretical and practice oriented arguments relating to public policy.

Required readings:

The course book is:

Howlett, M., M. Ramesh and A. Perl (2020), Studying Public Policy: Principles and Processes, (4th  edn). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.

In addition, a number of more advanced readings supplementing the book will also be included in the required readings, e.g.

Béland, D. (2009), ‘Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change, Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5): 701-718.

Mahoney, J. and K. Thelen. 2010. ’A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change’ in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds.) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power, New York: Cambridge University Press

Skogstad, G. (2017), ‘Policy Feedback and Self-Reinforcing and Self-Undermining Processes in EU Biofuels Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 24 (1): 21-41.

Wu, X., M. Ramesh and M. Howlett, (2017), ‘Policy Capacity: Conceptual Framework and Essential Components, in X. Wu, M. Howlett and M. Ramesh (eds.), Policy Capacity and Governance: Assessing Governmental Competences and Capabilities in Theory and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 243-261.

Zohlnhöfer, R., N. Herweg and C. Huß (2016) ‘Bringing Formal Political Institutions into the Multiple Streams Framework: An Analytical Proposal for Comparative

It is required that students have obtained minimum 60 ECTS in political science and/or economics or in equivalent disciplines
The course is taught in two stages. In the first stage, the course will introduce and utilise concepts and analytical frameworks to explain some of the policy phenomena that puzzles students of public policy. Participants will be introduced to theoretical approaches to studying the five basic stages of the policy cycle and discuss some of the more recent developments in the policy studies discipline. The way in which these analytical concepts can be applied to the study of real-world policy challenges will be illustrated and discussed in class through examples. The wealth of knowledge on national policy processes brought to the classroom by the students will be utilised to explore nuances in concept application and to explore how differences in institutions affect policy making.

In the second part of the course, the participants will work on their discussion papers for the exam (synopses). The discussion papers must engage In selected theoretical concepts in relation to analysing a specific policy case or to discuss theoretical issues
  • Category
  • Hours
  • Lectures
  • 33
  • Preparation
  • 163
  • Study Groups
  • 9
  • Exam
  • 1
  • Total
  • 206
Oral
Individual
Collective
Continuous feedback during the course of the semester
Feedback by final exam (In addition to the grade)
Credit
7,5 ECTS
Type of assessment
Oral exam on basis of previous submission, 30 minutes - no time for preparation
Type of assessment details
Individual oral exam based on a 2000 words discussion paper (synopsis) and the required readings. The discussion paper (synopsis) must be submitted a week before the exam week starts. Students work on the discussion paper (synopsis) during the course.
Aid
All aids allowed except Generative AI and internet access
Marking scale
7-point grading scale
Censorship form
External censorship
Re-exam

Same as the ordinary exam.

The discussion paper (synopsis) must be submitted two weeks before the re-exam week starts.

Criteria for exam assesment

Students should:
•    Demonstrate knowledge of key concepts and analytical frameworks for the study of the various stages in public policy;
•    Demonstrate knowledge of the major institutions and actors involved in the public policy process;
•    Demonstrate ability to engage key concepts in discussions on various theoretical and practical aspects of public policy;
•    Demonstrate ability to critically evaluate the use of concept in the analysis public policy issues;
•    Demonstrate ability to reflect critically on the politics and practices of public policy;
•    Demonstrate ability to think independently in relation to policy challenges