AØKA08209U Economics of Education Canceled spring 2019
This course explores why individuals and societies invest in education. Education has many private benefits (earnings, employment, health and longevity, consumption value), as well as social benefits (GDP growth, tax income, positive externalities). Education also affects inequality within a generation and across generations. Throughout this course, current policy issues concerning education will be discussed. Economic models will be connected to data that can be used to test the models' implications, and students will learn how models and data can serve to inform education policy. Applications will address primary and secondary education, university education, and vocational or on-the-job training, and place the Danish and European experience in an international context.
First, we introduce human capital theory to study individual decision-making. It will be used to analyze investments in education and how they are affected by ability, comparative advantage, family background, and macroeconomic conditions. We will encounter the empirical problem of disentangling the return to education from the return to innate ability, and investigate how the association between education and individual earnings has changed over time.
At the societal level, we study the social return to education and the financing of publicly provided schooling. Looking at the production of education, we ask how educational outcomes are produced by schools, whether financial resources improve student achievement, and which school inputs are more or less effective in producing desired educational outcomes (such as PISA test scores). We will consider the potential of early childhood education in the context of skill-formation over the life cycle. We will also reflect on possible conflicts between societal goals - efficiency, equity, and liberty - that influence decisions about the allocation of education resources.
From a macro perspective, education matters for national economic growth as well as for individual mobility. We investigate whether there is a risk of over-education, or whether individuals under-invest in light of a rapidly changing economic reality and international competition. We also study the intergenerational transmission of economic status through parental investments, credit constraints and achievement inequality, and the resulting income distribution.
This course will teach students how to apply economic thinking to education-related questions. In doing so, the class will draw on a wide range of economic principles and apply previously learned material. The variety of models and perspectives will range from macro to micro, including labor economics, macroeconomic growth, and public finance. Students will be equipped with an economic toolbox to evaluate education policy issues methodically, and should eventually be able to use these tools to inform education policy. While the course will be based on theory, it is nevertheless of an empirical nature: recent data will be used to evaluate current issues, and students will learn how to read empirical articles that form the state-of-the art in economics of education.
After taking this course, students should be able to apply economic theories to address education question as a well-trained economist and should be able to:
- Understand economic models in the education context,
- confidently identify determinants of equilibrium/optimality and describe the role they play relative to each other.
- Recall the frameworks and their assumptions, as well as their economic predictions.
- Know the empirical state-of-the-discipline where they need to be able to read selected articles in economic journals and exctract the appropriate conclusions. Additionally, they need to examine whether the presented empirical evidence convincingly identifies causal relationships. Later, evidence needs to be recalled to address topics.
Identify key questions in a brief non-specific text, presented as a policy issue rather than an economic model. Then, link the key questions to economics of education.
Need to select the theories and pieces of empirical evidence which are relevant for the question or debate. Students need to learn how to choose the correct theory or framework that helps them organize an argument around a given education issue (manage the topics).
Evaluate the real-life relevance of possible economic explanations or scenarios, to give an assessment of which explanation or hypothetical outcome is more or less likely. This means they have to navigate the sometimes contradicting models or papers that we have studied and present their trade-offs.
- Present arguments orally and in written form, which are based on their reading of theory as well as state-of-the-art empirical findings.
- Construct concise cases where they show their well-rounded appraisal of a situation that connects economic theory to the real world.
- Equipped to evaluate policy proposals critically and scientifically, and present arguments in favor or against them.
Main textbook: Checchi, D. (2006) The Economics of Education, Cambridge University Press (all chapters). ISBN: 9780521066464, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492280
In addition to the following examples of journal articles,
lecture notes (slides) are considered study material and are part of the syllabus.
Examples of further mandatory reading (a complete list of mandatory reading will be posted at the beginning of the course):
Becker, G. S. and N. Tomes (1986). Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families. Journal of Labor Economics 4 (3), 1-47.
Becker, G. S. (1991) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. National Bureau of Economic Research, distributed by Columbia University Press. Chapter 4 and its Appendix.
Belley, P. and L. J. Lochner (2007). The Changing Role of Family Income and Ability in Determining Educational Achievement. Journal of Human Capital 1 (1), 37-89.
Cunha, F. and J. J. Heckman (2007). The Technology of Skill Formation. The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 97 (2), 31-47.
Psacharopoulos, G. and H. A. Patrinos (2004). Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update. Education Economics 12 (2), 111-134.
Solon, G. (2002). Cross-Country Differences in Intergenerational Earnings Mobility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (3), 59-66.
Hanushek, E. A. and L. Woessmann (2010). Education and Economic Growth. In D. J. Brewer and P. J. McEwan (Eds.), Economics of Education, Volume 2, pp. 60-67.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lleras-Muney, A. (2005). The Relationship Between Education and Adult Mortality in the United States. Review of Economic Studies 72 (1), 189-221.
Lochner, L. J. and E. Moretti (2004). The Effect of Education on Crime: Evidence from Prison Inmates, Arrests, and Self-Reports. The American Economic Review 94 (1), 155-189.
Belfield, C. R. (2000) Economic Principles for Education: Theory and Evidence, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. Chapter 2.
- Borjas, G. J. (2000) Labor Economics, 2nd Ed., Irwin Mcgraw-Hill. Chapter 6.
In the first couple of weeks of the course, therefore, we study human capital theory and students are expected to be able to follow the derivations of these models themselves. This requires knowledge of constrained optimization techniques. They will be practiced in the exercise classes.
Then, building on this foundation, we study empirical papers and discuss the benefits/disadvantages of different approaches to using available data to evaluate questions such as the returns to education. While students will not be working with data themselves in this course, a basis in econometrics is needed to a) understand issues such as causality, and b) interpret the estimation results presented in the scientific papers.
Ideally, students should have taken the courses Microeconomics I, Microeconomics II, "Probability theory and statistics" (Econometrics A) and Econometrics II corresponding to the 2nd year undergraduate sequence in the Department of Economics at KU.
Active participation is expected during the lectures, as well as the exercise classes which include peer-feedback on assignments.
With some topics, we will practice the argumentation skills in a panel-discussion, where prepared content is debated and the strengths of different arguments evaluated.
Mandatory individual assignments prepare technical material and practice the exam form (written evaluation of policy-relevant education issues, demonstrating ability to draw on appropriate economic theories).
2 hours lectures 1 to 2 times a week from week 6 to 20 (except holidays).
2 hours exercise classes a week from week 6 or 7 to 21 (except holidays).
The course is not offered in spring 2019
Timetable and venue:
To see the time and location of lectures and exercise classes please press the link/links under "Se skema" (See schedule) at the right side of this page (E means Autumn, F means Spring). The lectures is shown in each link.
You can find the similar information partly in English at
-Select Department: “2200-Økonomisk Institut” (and wait for respond)
-Select Module:: “2200-XXX; [Name of course]”
-Select Report Type: “List – Weekdays”
-Select Period: “Forår/Spring – Week 5-30”
Press: “ View Timetable”
Please be aware regarding exercise classes:
- The schedule of the exercise classes is only a pre-planned schedule and can be changed until just before the teaching begins without the participants accept. If this happens it will be informed at the intranet or can be seen in the app myUCPH and at the above link.
- If too many students have wished a specific class, students will be registered randomly at another class.
- The student is not allowed to participate in an exercise class not registered, because the room has only seats for the amount of registered student.
- That the study administration allocates the students to the exercise classes according to the principles stated in the KUnet.
For students not enrolled please find more information at Study Economics.
- 7,5 ECTS
- Type of assessment
- Written examination, 3 hours under invigilationat the computers of Copenhagen University. The exam assignment is given in English and must be answered in English.
- Exam registration requirements
There will be about 8 Assignments, which are graded 0 (fail), 1 (pass), 2 (outstanding). In order to qualify to participate in the final exam, students need to obtain a total score in their assignments that is at least 75% of the total possible points on the basis of passes. At 8 assignments, students need to pass at least 6 with a grade of "1".
- Without aids
- Marking scale
- 7-point grading scale
- Censorship form
- No external censorship
The course can be selected for external assessment.
- Exam period
The course is not offered in spring 2019. Students who need to take the exam again must contact the study administration.
The course is not offered in spring 2019. Students who need to take the exam again must contact the study administration.
If only a few students have registered for the written re-exam, the reexam might change to an oral exam including the date, time and place for the exam, which will be informed by the Examination Office.
Criteria for exam assesment
Students are assessed on the extent to which they master the learning outcome for the course.
To receive the top grade, the student must with no or only a few minor weaknesses be able to demonstrate an excellent performance displaying a high level of command of all aspects of the relevant material and can make use of the knowledge, skills and competencies listed in the learning outcomes.
As a very basic requirement for passing the course, students must demonstrate sufficient understanding of the human capital models, correctly recall their goals, assumptions, and predictions (knowledge of theory), and recall the purpose, econometric approach, and findings of empirical papers we read (knowledge of empirics).
In order to pass, students must also demonstrate the skill of linking their passive knowledge of models and empirical papers to a given (hypothetical) real-world situation. This means they must be able to select the models or papers that are appropriate and relevant to the case at hand, and then evaluate their different predictions or arguments, and for example point to the instances where a model's assumption diverges from a real-life scenario (skill).
In order to receive full credit, students must demonstrate a well-developed competency to construct arguments on complex education issues that utilize the best available resources from economics of education – be they theoretical or empirical.
- Class Instruction