ASTK12262U Social theories of power in the globalization age

Volume 2014/2015
Content

The concept of power is central to any understanding of society, and even more ubiquitous in complex modern societies. Complex modern societies, as a result of its long historical construction, are characterized by a multi-dimensional nature of power. Despite its importance, power is still one of the most difficult concepts within the social sciences. While in everyday speech power tends to be associated with dominance or coercion, in the social sciences there is a high diversity and multiplicity in the conceptualization of power. This course aims to make sense out of these different understandings of power. It will also make the concept applicable and operative, and will be applied to the analysis of contemporary phenomena of globalization. That is, how can the different theories, conceptualizations and dimensions of power be applied to current transnational and globalizing dynamics?.

 

The course is structured in three parts with its sub-units. In part I the main theoretical questions and debates are presented and discussed. In part II the four main dimensions or sources of power in modern society are introduced and discussed, through some key authors and their respective perspectives. In part III the different conceptualizations and dimensions of power of Part I and II are applied to analyze current phenomena of globalization. We will follow up and develop Beck’s (2006) attempt to analyze power in the global age. We will focus on the following four domains: a) states and inter-national relations; b) economy, capital and business; c) societies, civil society and social classes; and d) social and political sciences and professions. In this part III groups of students will be made; these groups, based on the specific readings, will discuss and debate how power is and works in the four globalization domains. These discussions should inform the content of the synopsis for oral examination.

 

Structure of the course:

 

1. Introduction. Course overview.

 

Part I. Main questions and debates in the theories of power.

 

2. Power “over” and power “to”.

3. Elites vs. pluralist polyarchies.

4. Conflictual or/and consensual

5. Related concepts: dominance, hegemony, authority, legitimacy, influence.

 

Part II. Four main dimensions or sources of power in modern society, and key authors

 

6. Political or state-related power: Weber, Bachrarch and Baratz, Dahl, Mann, etc.

7. Cultural, cognitive or ideological: Foucault, Clegg, etc.

8. Economic-material interests and conflicts: Marx, Lukes, etc.

9. Social structure and interaction: Parsons, Giddens, Bourdieu, Barnes, Haugaard, etc.

 

Part III. Power in the age of globalization. Focus on four globalization domains.

 

10. States: nation-states, international relations and the challenge of a global polity

11. Economy: capital, multi-national corporations and local economies and small business.

12. Societies: social classes/groups and civil societies and the challenge of global common interests and norms.

13. Social Sciences: national social/political sciences, professions and the challenge of the “cosmopolitan outlook”.

 

14. Conclusion and summing-up.
 

Competences

This course will provide students with a thorough knowledge on a key issue and concept in social theory and social sciences, which can be applied in many other topics, courses and themes. Likewise it will enhance students’ skills to understand political or state-related activities and phenomena within a broader perspective through the analysis of power in our complex modern societies.

 

 

Learning Outcome

The objective of the course is to enable students to:

  • Understand the main theories and conceptualizations of power.
  • Identify and differentiate the multi-dimensional nature of power in modern societies
  • Apply theories and conceptualizations of power to analyze current phenomena.
  • Relate the theoretical debate on power to the current globalization process.
  • Reflect meta-theoretically on the strengths and weaknesses of the theories.

Part I and Part II:

General reading

 Beck, Ulrich (2006) Power in the global age. London: Polity Press. (350 pages)

Haugaard, Mark (1997) The Constitution of power: A theoretical analysis of power, knowledge and structure. Manchester University Press. (234 pages)

Haugaard, Mark and Ryan, Kevin (2012) Political Power: The development of the field. Barbara Budrich-Esser. (230 pages)

Mann, Michael (2011) Power in the 21st. century. London: Polity Press. (180 pages)

 

Specific reading

Haugaard, Mark (1999) “Power: social and political theories of” (pp.1710-1724), in Enciclopaedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict, Vol. 3, 2nd edition, San Diego: Academic Press.

Haugaard, Mark (ed.) (2002) Power. A reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press (Conceptual map and introduction” (pp. 1-5); Clegg (pp. 245-273); Haugaard (pp. 304-328)

 

Göhler, Gerhard (2009) “Power to and power over”, in Clegg, Stewart and Haugaard, Mark (ed.) (2009) The Sage Handbook of Power. London: Sage. (Chap. 1. pp. 28-39)

Hauggard, Mark (2008) “Power and legitimacy”, in Massimo Mazzoti (ed.) Knowledge as Social Order. Asghate, London. (pp. 120-130)

Haugaard, Mark (2009) “Power and hegemony”, in Clegg, Stewart and Haugaard, Mark (ed.) (2009) The Sage Handbook of Power. London: Sage. (Chap. 13. pp. 239-255.)

 

Part III

Beck, Ulrich (2006) Global Domestic Politics Changes the Rules: On the breaching of boundaries in economics, politics and society, in Beck, Ulrich (2006) Power in the Global Age (Chap. 3: pp. 51-114).

 

-States and international relations

Cerny, Philip G. (2009) “Reconfiguring Power in a globalizing world”, in Clegg, Stewart and Haugaard, Mark (eds.) (2009) The Sage Handbook of Power, London: Sage. (Chap. 21: 383-399).

Nye, Joseph S. (2011) Power and foreign policy, Journal of Political Power4 (1): 9-24.

-Capital and business

 

Bichler, Shimshon and Jonathan Nitzan (2012) “Capital as power: Toward a new cosmology of capitalism”, real-world economics review, Issue no. 61: 65-84.

 

Fuchs, Doris (2013) "Theorizing the power of Global Companies,” in John Mikler (ed.) The Handbook of Global Companies. London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. (Chapter 5: pp. 77-95).

 

-Societies: civil societies, social groups and classes.

Lipschutz, Ronnie D. (2005) "Power, politics and global civil society." Millennium-Journal of International Studies 33.3: 747-769.

Robinson, William I. (2012) "Global capitalism theory and the emergence of transnational elites." Critical Sociology 38.3: 349-363.

 

-Social sciences and professions

 Faulconbridge, J. R., & Muzio, D. (2012). “Professions in a globalizing world: Towards a transnational sociology of the professions”. International Sociology, 27 (1), 136-152.

 Fourcade, Marion (2006) "The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics." American Journal of Sociology 112.1: 145-194.

The Journal of Political Power (earlier Journal of Power) can be an adequate source to follow the academic debate on power.

There will be as many readings as possible available in course’s website.

Knowledge on social and political theories at BA level is required.
Participation: participants are expected to read the selected essential readings for the classes, and to take part actively in the discussions and debates.

The classes will consist of a combination of short lecturing, seminar discussions and debates, student presentations, group-work, and possibly talks by guest lecturers or external speakers.
  • Category
  • Hours
  • Class Instruction
  • 28
  • Exam
  • 79
  • Preparation
  • 168
  • Total
  • 275
Credit
10 ECTS
Type of assessment
Oral examination
Synopsisexam
Marking scale
7-point grading scale
Censorship form
External censorship
Criteria for exam assesment

Criteria for achieving the goals:

  • Grade 12 is given for an outstanding performance: the student lives up to the course's goal description in an independent and convincing manner with no or few and minor shortcomings
  • Grade 7 is given for a good performance: the student is confidently able to live up to the goal description, albeit with several shortcomings
  • Grade 02 is given for an adequate performance: the minimum acceptable performance in which the student is only able to live up to the goal description in an insecure and incomplete manner