ASTK18006U Core Subject: Democratic Challenges
Core subject in the core-subject line in Political Theory
The aim of this course is to provide an in-depth analysis of the main challenges to democratic government in Europe and elsewhere. To what extent has traditional representative democracy in the political form of the nation-state become an inadequate mode of government, and how do pressing crises and challenges such as globalization, rising inequality, climate change and populism encourage us to rethink the very idea of democracy?
The first part of course will examine these questions with a focus on new theories of democracy and political agency. The second part of the course will turn to actual political issues in order to further advance the discussion of the challenges facing democratic government in the 21st century. Among the topics to be discussed are globalization, rising inequality, post-national democracy, populism, the EU, and climate change.
Democratic Challenges is required for students enrolled in the Specialization in Political Theory.
The objective of the course is to enable the students to:
- Describe the main approaches in contemporary democratic theory.
- Understand and explain main divisions and developments in contemporary democratic theory.
- Evaluate the validity of the various theorists’ arguments.
- Present and analyze key trends, tensions and contradictions incontemporary democratic theory.
- Combine and synthesize contributions (theoretical or otherwise) to discussions about democracy in the 21st century.
- Apply the theories to issues such as globalization, populism and climate change.
- Critical thinking across different theories and styles of argumentation.
- Writing and presentation in a concise and clear manner.
- Ability to develop a coherent argument.
The following is a preliminary reading list. Other materials will be added before the beginning of the semester.
Arendt, Hannah (1969) ‘Civil Disobedience’.
Bennett, Jane (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.
Bohman, James (2009) From Demos to Demoi.
Brown, Wendy (2006) Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in an Age of Identity and Empire.
Brown, Wendy (2015), Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution
Butler, Judith (2015), Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly
Connolly, William (2013) The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neo-Liberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism.
Dean, Jodi (2010) The Communist Horizon.
Forst, Rainer (2013) Toleration in Conflict.
Fraser, Nancy (2015), “Legitimation Crisis? On the Political Contradictions of Financialized Capitalism”, Critical Historical Studies (Fall 2015)
Habermas, Jürgen (2012) The Crisis of the European Union.
Mahmood, Saba (2009) ‘Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide?’ Critical Inquiry, Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 835-861.
March, Andrew (2011) ‘Speaking about Muhammed, Speaking for Muslims’, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 806-821.
Müller, Jan-Werner (2016), What is Populism
Offe, Claus (2015), Europe Entrapped.
Pettit, Philip (1999) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.
Robin, Corey (2017), The Reactionary Mind. Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump
Rodrik, Dani (2017), “Populism and the Economics of Globalization”, Research Paper, August 2017. Available at: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/populism_and_the_economics_of_globalization.pdf
Thomassen, Lasse & Marina Prentoulis (2013) 'Political Theory in the Square: Protest, Representation and Subjectivation', Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 166-184.
Urbinati, Nadia (2014). Democracy Disfigured.
- 7,5 ECTS
- Type of assessment
- Written examinationFree assignment
- Marking scale
- 7-point grading scale
- Censorship form
- External censorship
Criteria for exam assesment
- Grade 12 is given for an outstanding performance: the student lives up to the course's goal description in an independent and convincing manner with no or few and minor shortcomings
- Grade 7 is given for a good performance: the student is confidently able to live up to the goal description, albeit with several shortcomings
- Grade 02 is given for an adequate performance: the minimum acceptable performance in which the student is only able to live up to the goal description in an insecure and incomplete manner
- Class Instruction