ASTK12315U Course: China's energy policy - implications for the future of Chinese power

Volume 2014/2015
Education
Bachelorlevel: 10 ECTS
Masterlevel: 7,5 ECTS
Content

In the last decade, Chinese national oil companies (NOCs) have engaged in purchases of resources, i.e. oil, gas and minerals, in regions such as Africa, Central Asia and North America. On the one hand, the companies have been seen as acting under instructions and in close co-ordination with the Chinese government; on the other it has been pointed to that there is no coordination between the companies and the government. This course provides a framework for understanding the interactions between the companies and the government. The course’s wider agenda is to consider important questions within international political economy such as what the way the Chinese state handles the country’s energy policy shows about the country’s state capacity in post-reform China as well as about Chinese policy-making and energy governance. What can the Chinese case tell us about the government’s ability to steer the economy? Ultimately, how China handles its energy policy has ramifications for the country’s stability and can serve as an indicator of the country’s foreign policy and future position in the international system.

 

The course has several goals. The first is to introduce students to the context of Chinese energy governance and energy policy in post-reform China. The second goal is to consider the steps taken by the Chinese government to ensure its energy security. In this way, it can serve as a case for understanding more general tendencies within international political economy.

 

The course will raise many questions, but few may be answered decisively. Students will be expected to read widely and wrestle with concepts, not just accumulate facts. Class meetings will emphasize discussion, not lectures.

 

The rationale behind the structure of the course is to put the case of Chinese energy companies/energy policy into a broader context. Doing this, in a first part, a number of theoretical perspectives will be introduced. We will look at the question of Chinese power from an IPE perspective, we will look at different aspects of Chinese energy governance, and finally, we will look at perspectives on Chinese energy security and energy policy.

In a second part, the theoretical tools will be used to look at the activities of Chinese companies in a number of countries in both Africa, North America, Europe and Central Asia. These case studies will help us understand the steps taken by the Chinese government to ensure its energy security. Moreover, the case studies can help us understand the implications of Chinese energy policy for the country’s foreign policy and for the future of Chinese power.

 

The course will be structured in the following way:

1: Introduction

2: The question of Chinese power: IPE perspectives

3: China’s energy governance: the energy administration

4: Chinese energy governance: the relationship between the energy companies and the government

5: The role of Chinese energy security

6: Chinese energy policy and foreign policy

7: Case: the case of Sudan

8: Case: the cases of Angola and Nigeria

9: Case: the case of Canada

10: Case: the case of Denmark

11: Case: the case of Kazakhstan

12: Case: the case of Uzbekistan

13: Conclusion

 

Competency description

This course equips the student to understand current Chinese energy governance and energy policy and enhances the students’ ability to understand important questions within the realm of international political economy as well as international relations. The course is relevant to students who aim for a career in, for example, international organisations, diplomacy and global companies.

Learning Outcome

The objective of the course is that the students after the course:

  • Show knowledge and insights into the important developments and challenges in Chinese energy governance.
  • Show an ability to describe the main characteristics of the development in Chinese energy governance, as well as the main characteristics of China’s energy governance in the last decade.
  • Show an ability to present and discuss the main arguments in the academic literature on China’s energy governance and energy security, as well as within international political economy.
  • Show analytical skills in conducting a theoretically grounded analysis of China’s energy policy in specific regions as well as of China’s foreign policy both at the regional and global level.
  • Show an ability to assess the importance of factors guiding China’s energy policy as well as the importance of factors on the regional and global level guiding the development in Chinese foreign policy.
  • Show ability to derive theoretically grounded reflections on how to expect China to further evolve as a regional and global great power.
  • Alden, Chris (2007): China in Africa. African Arguments, London: Zed Books: 8-36.
  • Andrews-Speed, Philip (2004): “Energy Policy and Regulation in the People's Republic of China”, The Hague: Kluver Law International: 1-36.
  • Brødsgaard, Kjeld Erik (2012), “Politics and Business Group Formation in China: The Party in Control?”, China Quarterly, vol. 211, no. 9: 624-648.
  • Christensen, Thomas, Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert Ross (1996): “Conclusions and Future Directions”, in New Directions in the Study of China’s Foreign Policy, Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert Ross (eds.), Stanford: Stanford University Press: 379-420.
  • Downs, Erica S. (2000): “China’s Quest for Energy Security”, Santa Monica, Cal.: RAND: 1-10.
  • Downs, Erica S. (2008): “New Interest Groups in Chinese Foreign Policy”, in China’s Changing Political Landscape: Prospects for Democracy, Cheng Li (ed), Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution: 121-141.
  • Fewsmith, Joseph and Stanley Rosen (2001): “The Domestic Context of Chinese Foreign Policy: Does Public Opinion Matter?”, in The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978-2000, David Lampton (ed.), Stanford: Stanford University Press: 151-187
  • Gilpin, Robert (1987): The Political Economy of International relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press: 3-24.
  • Goldstein, Avery (2005): Rising to the Challenge: China’s Grand Strategy and International Security, Stanford University press, Stanford: 1-13, 204-220.
  • Huang, Yasheng (2008): Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics. Entrepreneurship and the State, New York: Cambridge University Press: 1-49, 233-298.
  • Lampton, David M. (2001): “China’s Foreign and National Security Policy-Making Process: Is It Changing and Does It Matter?”, in The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978-2000, David M. Lampton (ed.), Stanford: Stanford University Press: 1-38.
  • Kohli, Atul (2004): State-directed development. Political power and industrialization in the global periphery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-26.
  • Kong, Bo (2010): China's International Petroleum Policy, Praeger Publishers, Santa Barbara: 1-94.
  • Lieberthal, Kenneth (1992): “Introduction: The Fragmented Authoritarianism” Model and its Limitations”, Bureaucracy, Politics and Decision Making in Post-Mao China, Kenneth Lieberthal and David Lampton (eds.), Berkeley: University of California Press: 1-30.
  • Lieberthal, Kenneth and Michel Oksenberg (1988): Policy Making in China. Leaders, Structures and Processes, Princeton: Princeton University Press: 3-34.
  • Mertha, Andrew (2009), ””Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process”, The China Quarterly, vol. 200: 995-1012.
  • Naughton, Barry (1995): Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978-1993, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-25, 309-326.
  • Shambaugh, David (1996): ”Containment or Engagement of China? Calculating Beijing’s Responses”, International Security, vol. 21, no. 2: 180-209.
  • Shirk, Susan (1993): The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China, Berkeley: University of California Press: 1-52.
  • Shirk, Susan (2007): Fragile Superpower: How China´s Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-78.
  • Steinfeld, Edward (2010): Playing Our Game. Why China’s Rise Doesn’t Threaten the West, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-47, 175-235.
  • Taylor, Ian (2006): “China’s Oil Diplomacy”, International Affairs, vol. 82, no. 5: 937–959.
  • Zha, Daojiong (2006): “Energy Interdependence”, China Security, vol 2, no. 2: 2-16.
The students are expected to have knowledge and understanding of theoretical insights and approaches from International Relations and Comparative Politics. Strong knowledge of Chinese history and politics is not required, but some basic knowledge is advised (see recommended readings).
The course form will be a mixture of lectures and discussions in plenum where the students have prepared answers to the questions listed in the course plan. Guest speakers will be invited and an active webpage will be maintained
  • Category
  • Hours
  • Class Instruction
  • 28
  • Course Preparation
  • 80
  • Exam
  • 70
  • Exam Preparation
  • 10
  • Preparation
  • 18
  • Total
  • 206
Credit
7,5 ECTS
Type of assessment
Written assignment
Written
Marking scale
7-point grading scale
Censorship form
External censorship
Criteria for exam assesment
  • Grade 12 is given for an outstanding performance: the student lives up to the course's goal description in an independent and convincing manner with no or few and minor shortcomings
  • Grade 7 is given for a good performance: the student is confidently able to live up to the goal description, albeit with several shortcomings
  • Grade 02 is given for an adequate performance: the minimum acceptable performance in which the student is only able to live up to the goal description in an insecure and incomplete manner